Theme 4: Globalization influences on modern legal characteristics of European and domestic anti-corruption culture
The Project Coordinator, Associate Professor O. Makarenkov, held regular scheduled lecture within the specified course. Through the Internet on the Zoom VCI platform, he revealed the issues of correlation between the cultures of the peoples of Europe (external) and within the national culture (intériorisation) by the parameters of the dominance degree the human virtues while ensuring the public interest. He also noted that such a provision is functionally limited by legal private interest (lim f (x - x0), and together the interests of both types are determined by reliable indicators of the range of maximum possible free development of each person.
During the lecture, it was also established that corruption is a manifestation of dishonesty, which denies culture as a phenomenon and has a counter-civilizational character, especially quickly destroys high-tech complex civilizations, including European ones. Avoiding these illegal aberrations for European countries means only further strengthening the legal, managerial and educational mechanisms of institutionalization of legal, political, economic and other socialization of their own citizens. Through them there is an actualization of legal values stereotypes and patterns of behavior, which are alternative to corruption motives, based on the existing and future levels of social progress.
Participants discussed issues the responsibility subjects of law and temporal characteristics of European and domestic anti-corruption cultures, anthropic dimension of anti-corruption legislation, modern globalization contexts for integrity in the European national security, etc.
In order to adapt and borrow relevant foreign experience in Ukraine, the legal regulation of anti-corruption issues (criminal codes in the absence of special anti-corruption laws) and the relevant organizational and legal decisions of the following EU countries were taken into account:
1) Kingdom of Norway, where the specialization of the pre-trial investigation criminal cases body focuses on a system of dangerous to society economic and environmental crimes, including corruption offenses (ØKOKRIM, Norwegian National Authority for Investigation and Prosecution of Economic and Environmental Crime);
2) The Kingdom of Sweden and Finland, which are distinguished by the presence along with the Ministry of Justice and the National Prosecution Authority (Riksåklagaren / Syyttäjälaitosta) Chancellor of Justice (Justitiekanslern / Oikeuskanslerin, 1719), whose authority includes taking measures to restore human rights and freedoms violated by corruption.
